Lite Paper: Quant Layer AI
  • Introduction
  • Background
    • Quantum Computing and Cryptographic Vulnerabilities
    • Lattice-Based Cryptography
    • Vulnerabilities in Current Wallet Solutions
  • A 5-Step Framework for Quantum Resistance
    • Step 1: Identify the Threat
    • Step 2: Assess the Risk
    • Step 3: Select Quantum-Resistant Algorithms
    • Step 4: Design Quantum-Resistant Protocols
    • Step 5: Consider Quantum-Resistant Hardware
  • Layer 2 Protocol Implementation for Enhanced Encryption
  • Local Storage Encryption with Sphincs+
  • AI Agent Integration for Enhanced Security and Usability
  • Implementation on Ethereum
  • References
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. A 5-Step Framework for Quantum Resistance

Step 2: Assess the Risk

PreviousStep 1: Identify the ThreatNextStep 3: Select Quantum-Resistant Algorithms

Last updated 3 months ago

Risk assessment involves understanding the mathematical foundation of existing cryptographic schemes and evaluating their susceptibility to quantum algorithms like Shor’s and Grover’s. Cryptographic algorithms relying on the integer factorization problem (e.g., RSA) or the discrete logarithm problem (e.g., ECDSA) are quantum-broken. For Ethereum wallets:

  • Shor’s algorithm enables rapid factorization of RSA moduli, reconstructing private keys.

  • Grover’s algorithm accelerates brute-force attacks on symmetric key algorithms, reducing effective key lengths.

Graph Description: This figure illustrates the computational advantage quantum computers have over classical systems in breaking RSA and ECDSA through Shor’s algorithm. The graph shows an exponential increase in vulnerability as quantum hardware scales.

Organizations assess risks using metrics such as quantum volume (a measure of quantum computer performance) and projected timelines for scalable quantum systems. They then prioritize transitioning vulnerable systems to quantum-resistant alternatives.